Article Date: 05/30/2005

EDITOR'S NOTES | Issue 3-22

This week's common thread is about what pays and what doesn't pay. In Bilt-Rite v. The Architecture Studio, we learn that non-privity won't necessarily protect an architect (or engineer) with flawed plans from getting stuck with the bill for losses incurred by a bid-awarded contractor. It also doesn't pay to start a project before ink ... Log in to view the full text.

NOT YET A SUBSCRIBER?

Purchase a Subscription
with a money-back guarantee
and immediate access

Already a member?

Email: REQUIRED

Password: REQUIRED

Forgot your password? Click here to have your password emailed to you.